Evidence to the
National Assembly for Wales Health and Social Care Committee
Inquiry into Progress made to date on implementing the Welsh
Government’s Cancer Delivery Plan
|
Agencies: Macmillan Cancer
Support/Public Health Wales
|
Author: Caroline Walters, Macmillan Cancer
Information Strategic Lead, Public Health Wales
|
Introduction
- The National Cancer Patient
Information Strategy (NCPIS) Project is a three year partnership
project funded by Macmillan Cancer Support and hosted by Public
Health Wales exploring how patients can be consistently offered
tailored information and support from the point of diagnosis
onwards. The project is explicitly referenced within the
Welsh Government’s Cancer Delivery Plan (CDP) in relation to
meeting peoples’ needs. This inquiry response is based
on learning from the evidence gathered as part of phase 1 of the
NCPIS project and specifically refers to two questions
- Whether Wales is
on course to achieve the outcomes and performance measures, as set
out in the Cancer Delivery Plan, by 2016;
- the level of
collaborative working across sectors, especially between the NHS
and third sector, to ensure patients receive effective
person-centred care from multi-disciplinary teams.
Background
- Cancer is changing.
Thanks to advances
in early diagnosis and treatment, more people are living longer
with cancer or beyond it. By 2030, it’s estimated that
the number of people living with or after cancer in Wales will
nearly double to almost a quarter of a million.
This growing cancer
population will challenge existing models of cancer care. As
more cancer patients experience the disease as a long-term
condition, with patterns for many of relapse and remission, there
will be a need for ongoing and often long-term support and an
increasing drive for cancer survivors to self
manage.
3.
High quality
information and support (by which we mean content - which may be
spoken, printed or digital- available at the right time, in the
right format, which is quality assured and offered with a level of
support required) is an essential component of quality healthcare
and a pre-requisite to effective self-care. The case for
improving the co-ordination and delivery of cancer patient
information in Wales, as a key enabler to the delivery of the CDP
and changes to cancer care in Wales, is compelling as is
detailed in brief below;
4.
High quality
information and support is central to self-care yet the current
approach to information provision may widen health inequalities and
act as a barrier to effective self-management -
The growing
cancer population and financial pressures necessitates greater
self-management. However the current issues the project has
revealed in relation to the development, co-ordination and delivery
of patient information in Wales mean that many people cannot
consistently access information and support which meets their
individual needs and thus have the tools to self-manage. This
is exacerbated by the age and socio-economic profile of the cancer
population – a profile which is likely to indicate lower
health literacy levels and therefore an increased need for
information materials which are accessible and available in a range
of formats.
5.
High quality
information and support is closely linked to a positive patient
experience, yet a number
of the poorer scores given by patients
in the 2013
Welsh Cancer Patient Experience Survey
are
in respect of lack of information given to them about key aspects
of their condition, treatment and care - When patients are asked what really matters to them
in terms of their healthcare experience, good information is
consistently prioritised across conditions and settings. Yet the
recent Welsh Cancer Patient Experience Survey revealed significant
issues in relation to patient information with particular concerns
around the provision of easy to understand written information at
diagnosis, information for families following discharge and
information about the long term side effects of cancer diagnosis
and treatment.
-
High quality
information and support underpins the co-creation of healthcare yet
the current model of care predominantly views healthcare
professionals as information providers rather than enablers,
helping people to access information and support -
Research highlights
the importance of clinicians and specialist support staff acting as
an ‘infomediary’ for their patients/clients -
signposting them towards, and helping them to acquire, the high
quality health information and support they need.
This is key in
terms of empowering patients and their families to take
responsibility for their own healthcare with growing evidence that
more active patients enjoy better health outcomes and incur lower
costs.
Yet the
current model of care predominantly views health care professionals
as information providers rather than enablers. Increasingly
there will be a need to focus on enabling people to access
information and support to help themselves.
- The consequences of not
providing high quality, co-ordinated information and support are
significant leading to poor patient experience, ineffective care,
unnecessary interventions, litigation and wasted
resources- Problems relating to poor
communications and inadequate information remain one of the most
common causes of formal concerns in the health service
with the Citizens Advice Bureau suggesting that 1 in 5 of all
concerns relate to issues with regards communication and patient
information
In addition to costs
associated with concerns, issues with patient information also
impact on service utilisation and health costs. NHS England
data suggests that poor understanding of
doctors’ instructions and concerns over side-effects cost the
NHS approximately £500m per year due to issues with regards
adherence to treatment and medication regimens, A&E attendances
and unplanned hospital admissions.
A recent
King’s Fund report has also highlighted how issues with regards
clinicians fully informing and involving patients in decisions
about their care have a significant impact with the authors arguing
that well-informed patients choose fewer treatments, and involving
people in decisions about their healthcare helps to reduce
unwarranted variations in treatment.
The absence of an
agreed national approach to patient information provision across
all conditions also leads to significant duplication of effort
between local and national providers, with cost and resource
implications. This is explored further in response to the
inquiry terms of reference.
Response to the inquiry terms of
reference
Is Wales on course
to achieve the outcomes and performance measures, as set out in the
Cancer Delivery Plan, by 2016?
- The Welsh Government
Cancer Delivery Plan calls on Local Health Boards to publish
an annual report and a detailed local cancer delivery plan each
year. The project has analysed the annual reports and local
delivery plans available from the perspective of content on patient
information and is concerned by the varied nature of documents and
the lack of strategic direction in Health Board responses around
this key area. Health Boards principally focus on progress on
clinical data rather than how they are consistently meeting the
information needs of people affected by cancer. It is likely
this is related to the lack of clear performance measures governing
information for patients and their families or a strategic focus on
this important area.
- The CDP also
includes a commitment that ‘people have access to timely
information so they understand their condition and what to look out
for and what to do and which service to access should problems
occur.’ The recent Welsh Cancer Patient Experience
Survey (CPES) revealed that a number of the poorer scores
given by patients in the
survey were
in respect of information to them about key aspects of their
condition, treatment and care suggesting that this outcome is being
inconsistently achieved across Wales. Of the 19 patient and
family information questions, there was significant variation
between health boards on 16 questions (see Table 1 in Annex A)
suggesting wide scale variation at a geographical level.
The CPES
results also show variation in information and support provision by
tumour site with patients with certain tumour sites, such as lung,
brain, sarcoma and haematological cancers experiencing a poorer
information experience than other patients (see Table 2 in Annex A
which details the results of different tumour groups in relation to
key information questions).
- Research shows that people
affected by cancer consistently call for information on more
holistic aspects of care and this need is explicitly mentioned in
the CDP. However, responses to specific questions relating to
the availability of information about relationships, finances and
work within the CPES by Health Board highlighted
inconsistency and unmet needs in relation to non-clinical
information. For example, the percentage of patients who
required it given information about emotional support varied from
77% to 58% within health boards. The percentage of
respondents wanting and receiving information about the impact of
cancer on work or study varied from 74 to 56% and the percentage of
patients who would have liked and who were provided with
information on financial support varied from 28% to
53%.
- The CPES findings strongly
suggest that Wales is currently not on target to consistently
deliver on the outcome ‘people have access to timely
information so they understand their condition and what to look out
for and what to do and which service to access should problems
occur.’ This supports the project findings which
highlighted issues with regards the co-ordination and delivery of
patient information in Wales and suggests that Wales is lagging
behind other UK nations on this key area.
The level of collaborative working across sectors, especially
between the NHS and third sector, to ensure patients receive
effective person-centred care from multi-disciplinary
teams.
- The extensive evidence review
for the Project has highlighted that whilst there is evidence of
some good practice in relation to collaboration between the third
sector and the NHS in relation to patient information, there are a
number of key areas where collaboration is limited and could be
significantly enhanced. These primarily relate to information
content development and the provision of information and support
services. Given the challenging financial situation and growing
cancer population, there is a need to co-ordinate and dully utilise
all community assets to ensure truly person-centred
care.
- Content - Due to the absence of an
agreed national approach to patient information provision and a
single portal to host content, there are currently a wide range of
producers of health information content in Wales at a local and
national level with production varying in terms of format,
language, quality and the extent to which it is co-designed by the
intended audience, with no common standards in place across
Wales. A number of third sector organisations have
significant expertise in producing information and undertake
stringent quality assurance mechanisms yet content is not
consistently utilised or made accessible to professionals and the
public. This localised approach has an impact in terms of the
ability of services to offer up to date, accessible, quality
assured information in other languages and in a range of
formats. Currently there is evidence that too much of the
locally produced cancer patient information produced requires a
level of literacy not achieved by a significant proportion of the
Welsh population.
This uncoordinated approach also
leads to significant duplication of effort between local and
national providers, with cost and resource
implications.
-
Third Sector
Information and Support Services - An array of information services
exist in Wales including telephone, web and face to face support in
a variety of settings including hospital, library and
community. These services have significant potential to
complement information provision by health care professionals and
provide additional support to individuals who may struggle to
access and understand the information they require. However,
evidence suggests that usage of information services is currently
limited and raises questions as to the extent to which services are
integrated within care pathways and patients are consistently
signposted to services by healthcare professionals.
Recommendations
- As this response reveals, there
are currently significant challenges to the effective provision of
high quality supported cancer information in Wales and thus the
ability of Local Health Boards to achieve the expected outcomes as
stated in the Cancer Delivery Plan. In response to this
challenge, the NCPIS project advocates a strategic all-Wales
approach to cancer patient information in Wales,
as a pathfinder for
other conditions. This approach should be
underpinned by five key areas;
- agreement on sharing
content;
- development of quality
standards;
- development of a cancer
information portal;
- a skills framework to support
healthcare professionals enable access to health information;
and
- the integration and
consistent usage of community assets such as libraries and
community information services within care pathways.
- The NCPIS project suggest that a
national focus on patient information is needed to support
the implementation of the recommendations of the
project and to ensure improved outcomes in this key area for
patient engagement, experience and safety.
ANNEX A Table 1: Results of
Welsh Health Boards and Trusts in relation to key patient
information questions
Question
|
Abertawe Bro
Morgannwg
|
Aneurin Bevan
|
Betsi Cadwaladr
|
Cardiff and Vale
|
Cwm Taf
|
Hywel Dda
|
Velindre
|
Wales
|
Q14 Given easy to understand
information regarding the type of cancer
|
59%
|
62%
|
64%
|
62%
|
59%
|
61%
|
65%
|
62%
|
Q19. Definitely told about
future side effects
|
52%
|
58%
|
53%
|
54%
|
53%
|
51%
|
61%
|
55%
|
Q60. Staff definitely gave
family all information needed
|
52%
|
61%
|
61%
|
55%
|
53%
|
53%
|
61%
|
57%
|
Source: Wales Cancer Patient
Experience Survey 2014
ANNEX A Table 2: Results in relation
to key information questions by tumour type
Question
|
breast
|
Colorectal/lower
gastro
|
lung
|
prostate
|
Brain/CNS
|
gynaecological
|
Haematological
|
Head and neck
|
Skin
|
Upper gastro
|
urological
|
sarcoma
|
Q13 completely understood the
explanation of what was wrong
|
81%
|
78%
|
75%
|
80%
|
61%
|
73%
|
56%
|
77%
|
68%
|
68%
|
75%
|
63%
|
Q14.Given easy to understand
written information about the type of cancer
|
69%
|
62%
|
57%
|
78%
|
32%
|
49%
|
66%
|
50%
|
60%
|
48%
|
57%
|
34%
|
Q19 Definitely told about
possible future side effects of treatments
|
58%
|
56%
|
55%
|
65%
|
64%
|
52%
|
52%
|
55%
|
44%
|
49%
|
45%
|
58%
|
Source: Wales Cancer Patient
Experience Survey 2014
Macmillan Cancer Support. (2012).
Local Route Maps. London: Macmillan Cancer
Support.
Robert, G. a. (2011). What matters
to patients? Project Report for the Department of Health and NHS
Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Coventry: NHS
Institute for Innovation and Improvement.
Swain D, Ellins J, Coulter A, Heron
P, Howell E, Magee H,. (2007). Accessing Information about
Health and Social Services. London: Picker Institute
Europe.
Patient Information Forum. (2013).
Making the Case for Information - the evidence for investing in
high quality health information for patients and the public.
London: Patient Information Forum.
Sutherland, L. &. (2008). The
quest for quality: Refining the NHS reforms. London: Nuffield
Trust.
Patient Information Forum. (2013).
Making the Case for Information - the evidence for investing in
high quality health information for patients and the public.
London: Patient Information Forum.
Mulley, T. &. (2012).
Patients’ Preferences Matter: stop the silent
misdiagnosis. Cardiff: King's Fund.